Well, here is that the thorny issue of whether one should get oneself a far better education and degree qualified so as to compete within the workplace and stand out from the gang . it is a tough market out there and it’s an employers’ market – they will pick and choose who they need and, increasingly, they’re choosing graduates.
I’d just wish to discuss a few of individuals who I’ve worked with over the years; both of which were degree qualified. one among them had two degrees in fact; neither of those degrees in subjects that I’d ever heard of or subjects which she utilized in her occupation. She readily admitted that she couldn’t remember any of her course material which she could also not spell or punctuate a sentence correctly. She was also lazy and admittedly not an excellent advert for education . The person was degree educated in animal care. This person thought that having a degree rendered her bourgeoisie which opened an entire other debate. She was also pretty useless at her job and had about the maximum amount sense as my nan, god love her.
What does a degree prove I ask people? Does it make someone more intelligent than their peers without a degree? Does it give them a badge to wear, a belonging or added gravitas? i feel some people see it as a standing symbol which puts them in an elite group; a cut above the mere plebs who didn’t get the prospect to travel to college or who deliberately chose to travel to figure . I even have had conversations with people that feel that, because they need a degree, they’re far superior to those without. Someone said to me recently that being degree educated means you’ll have a far better class of conversation with people that are equally qualified which you’ve got a standard bond.
In my opinion, professional qualifications are much more important and, accompanied with experience during a role, they far outweigh anything that anyone could achieve on paper within the sort of a degree from any education organization. Professional, competence-based qualifications prove that you simply are competent at the tasks you perform in your job. they’re skills-related and that they demonstrate to folks that you’ve got ‘proved’ your worth therein field.
On the grounds of the ‘degree causes you to a cut above’ argument, if I’m a project manager and have a degree in leisure studies, does this mean I make a far better project manager due to my degree than someone with a PRINCE2 project management qualification? If I even have been doing the work of a qualifications’ manager for ten years but seek a promotion and can’t make it because i do not have a degree, would going out tomorrow and getting a degree suddenly enable me to try to to that job more effectively?
I have been involved in recruitment and I even have interviewed those with and without degrees. I can honestly say that, for the kinds of roles that I even have interviewed, there has been absolutely nobody who has ever impressed me with their degree over and above someone who has experience and a proven diary of being good at what they are doing . If someone was applying for employment as a forensic scientist, then in fact you’d expect them to possess a qualification which demonstrated their level of intelligence and knowledge of the complex subject matter; the likely scenario being that they might need a degree during a related field. But if someone was applying for employment as an events’ manager, then why would a degree be required? I could find you thousands of qualified and experienced people that could manage events who haven’t been near a University and who don’t need a degree to try to to their jobs effectively.
If, in ten years time, 50% of the population of the united kingdom goes to be degree qualified, does that not devalue the degree to the extent that it’s just not well worth the paper it’s written on anymore? Is it not an equivalent principle because the GCSEA grade, which seems to be more and more the norm and causes you to question its worth?
I’m also a believer that there are degrees then there are degrees. Someone in my family features a Masters in Physics from Durham and a Theology degree from Oxford. you can’t possibly tell me that this will be in any way compared with a 3rd in tourism. I just won’t accept it. it is a nonsense to even begin to match them.
And do people placed on their CVs, “yeah I got a 3rd in sociology and messed about for 3 years”? in fact they do not . They embellish their degree or they hide the important truth because the word ‘degree’ on its own seems enough to tug the wool over tons of people’s eyes. i feel it’s such a shame that the genuinely intelligent people out there who have worked extremely hard for his or her degrees and have gone on to use them wisely and paid back their fees should be up against those that visited Uni for a touch of amusing , larked about for a couple of years and walked out with the bare minimum at the tax payer’s expense but who then have the audacity to expect the proper to a far better job on the rear of it. i might go thus far on say the latter category of individuals infuriates me.
So what is the point of this ramble? Well, if having a degree makes people so superior, then why can an enormous proportion of graduates neither spell nor punctuate correctly? Basic functions that intelligent citizenry should be ready to perform don’t necessarily seem to follow within the degree educated. Why is their public knowledge so embarrassingly poor? What has University taught them? What has the tax payer’s money provided them with?